Exact discrete Fourier transform
Compute the exact discrete Fourier transform of a complex vector of any positive length . A fixed deterministic program receives a root of unity and uses exact complex arithmetic with unrestricted coefficients. Integer values and indices are polynomially bounded. Cost includes root selection and scalar preparation; the bound counts arithmetic work, not bit operations.
Classic bound: (Cooley and Tukey 1965; Bluestein 1970).
The bound has the form . is the saving in the logarithmic exponent; higher is better.
- What counts as Claimed: Published results for this problem without a qualifying repository review or Lean proof check.
- What counts as Human Verified: This problem has no community repo with a qualifying review rule.
- What counts as Lean Verified: A result shows here when we rebuild its Lean proof from source and check, with the Lean kernel, that it proves our exact problem statement. Last checked .
| Rank | Bound | Evidence levelLevel | Player | Date | Link | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lean Verified | Source | ||||
| 2 | Claimed | Source | ||||
| 3 | Jain round-eleven finite network, physical interfaces, and written all-length Fourier transfer; independent review and end-to-end formal verification pending. | Claimed | Source | |||
| 4 | This bound assumes the community paired-cube complex network is correct, together with the stated batched recursion and Fourier transfer. | Claimed | Source | |||
| 5 | This bound assumes the pinned Swapnil-jain round-six complex network is correct, together with the stated transfer to OpenAI’s Fourier algorithm. | Claimed | Source | |||
| 6 | Lean Verified | Source | ||||
| 7 | First breakthrough · Lean Verified | Source |
No results match the selected evidence levels.
in , higher is better in log scale, higher is better
The line connects only entries that improve the best dated bound at the selected evidence levels. The first breakthrough always stays in the progression, regardless of the evidence filters. Its star marks the start of the race. Other marks use the shape of their evidence level. Hover, focus, or tap a mark to see the entry and its source. Dates use known publication or commit dates. The Oct 6 announcements supply the day when an earlier publication date is unknown. A day without a known time has no hour in its tooltip. These dates do not establish scientific priority. Range controls end at the latest dated result. A line entering from the left shows the record already in force; its original mark stays outside the selected range.
Hollow marks show strict upper endpoints: the bound holds for each smaller fixed value, but not necessarily at the endpoint. They join the record line when the table ranks them first among the dated results available at that time.
On All, the dashed reference is the problem’s limit, (). It is a reference, not a proved attainable bound. Zoomed views omit this reference and fit the scale to their visible marks.
Claimed. The result is published, but no review repository accepted it and we have not checked a Lean proof.
Human Verified. The result meets the repository review rule stated on the problem page.
Lean Verified. We rebuild its Lean proof from source and check, with the Lean kernel, that it proves our exact problem statement.